It has become painfully obvious that our federal government has almost become gridlocked on any legislation that is driven by political idealism and party positions. Bi-partisanship is, unfortunately, ruling the day and there we no longer have a President with the desire or ability to lead – but rather the desire and ability to criticize the Republican party whenever he does not like the way things are going. The failure of the “Super Committee” this weak highlights his latest failure to step up and lead. Anybody with any political experience knows that they would have presented a plan to Congress if he has stepped in and made them work it out.
A scholar from the Institute for Policy Innovation declared the official death of the Super Committee this way:
November 22, 2011 Nov. 22: A Lone Gunman and the (Budget) Crime of the Century
On Nov. 22 we recognize the tragic loss of an American icon, one that became a symbol of hope for millions of Americans, as well as others around the world, that Washington could do better. That we could begin to shape a future that was better than the past and move forward knowing that we were not asking what our country could do for us, but what we could do for … ourselves.
I am talking, of course, not about JFK, but about the tragic death of the Super Committee.
News accounts of its waning days indicated that the Super Committee tried mightily to reach a deal. Both sides identified some concessions they were willing to make; Camelot might be in sight. But it wasn’t to be.
There are conspiracy theorists who believe lots of people were responsible for the failure. Count me in the “lone gunman” category. An out-of-touch, left-leaning individual running for reelection killed it.
He has decided that demonizing higher-income families and demanding that they pay higher tax rates is a political winner for him in 2012, even if it devastates his party—as it did in 2010.
Others may have wanted a deal; he didn’t, unless it included not just increased revenues—which some Republicans were apparently willing to concede—but higher tax rates, which Republicans would not accept.
The dream of a bipartisan solution is dead. Now we’ll see if the gunman can get away with his crime.
**************
Today’s PolicyByte was written by IPI Resident Scholar Dr. Merrill Matthews.
PolicyBytes is published by the Institute for Policy Innovation and distributed via email, as well as through the website at http://www.ipi.org PolicyBytes may be reproduced or quoted with appropriate attribution, which should include the name PolicyBytes, and either the name "Institute for Policy Innovation", or the acronym "IPI". Media inquiries should be directed to
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it